United States v. Michael Joseph Vogel

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24948, 1995 WL 404833
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 10, 1995·No. 94-7014·Published

Opinion

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Joseph VOGEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7014.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.

Michael Joseph Vogel, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Vogel, Nos. CR-89-210-HM; CA-94-177-HM (D. Md. Aug. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Joseph Vogel, 60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24948, 1995 WL 404833 (4th Cir. 1995).

60 F.3d 826 (United States v. Michael Joseph Vogel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.