United States v. Michael Indelicato
This text of 677 F. App'x 428 (United States v. Michael Indelicato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Michael Indelicato appeals the denial by the district court of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We affirm.
Indelicato was convicted of firearms offenses in 1985, and this court affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Indelicato, 800 F.2d 1482 (9th Cir. 1986) (per curiam). Indelicato provides no valid reasons for waiting until 2014 to collaterally attack his convictions. See United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1004 (9th Cir. 2007). His claims do not rest on newly discovered evidence or a change in the law, and any mis-advice by his lawyers in the mid-1980s cannot excuse his failure to take any action for over 25 years.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 F. App'x 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-indelicato-ca9-2017.