United States v. Michael Hubbard

93 F. App'x 97
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2004·No. 03-3028·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Hubbard appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000) (referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to consider in revoking supervised release), and did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence above the suggested Guidelines range, see United States v. Shepard, 329 F.3d 619, 621 (8th Cir.2003); United States v. Shaw, 180 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Hubbard, 93 F. App'x 97 (8th Cir. 2004).

93 F. App'x 97 (United States v. Michael Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Shannon Shaw
180 F.3d 920 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)