United States v. Michael Hubbard

93 F. App'x 97
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2004
Docket03-3028
StatusUnpublished

This text of 93 F. App'x 97 (United States v. Michael Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Hubbard, 93 F. App'x 97 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Hubbard appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000) (referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to consider in revoking supervised release), and did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence above the suggested Guidelines range, see United States v. Shepard, 329 F.3d 619, 621 (8th Cir.2003); United States v. Shaw, 180 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Shannon Shaw
180 F.3d 920 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 F. App'x 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-hubbard-ca8-2004.