United States v. Michael Hirano
This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (United States v. Michael Hirano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael HIRANO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-6717.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.
John Minh Tran, GREENBERG, BRACKEN & TRAN, Alexandria, VA, for Appellant. John Thomas Martin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hirano, No. CR-93-29-A (E.D. Va. June 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F.3d 1217, 1995 WL 88934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-hirano-ca4-1995.