United States v. Michael Herrold

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Michael Herrold. Read the opinion of the Court — 883 F.3d 517
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 7, 2017·No. 14-11317·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 14-11317 July 7, 2017 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff − Appellee versus

MICHAEL HERROLD,

Defendant − Appellant

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas __________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion February 12, 2016, 5 Cir., 2016, 813 F.3d 595) (Opinion on Remand from U.S. Sup. Ct. April 11, 2017, 5 Cir., 2017, ___ Fed. Appx. ___)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Herrold, (5th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Michael Herrold (United States v. Michael Herrold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael Herrold
813 F.3d 595 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)