United States v. Michael Gamboa
This text of United States v. Michael Gamboa (United States v. Michael Gamboa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
Nos. 07-1225/1338 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Michael Gerald Gamboa, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: October 3, 2008 Filed: October 6, 2008 ___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Michael Gamboa challenges the district court’s1 initial failure to rule on his pro se post-judgment motions and its subsequent denial of his pro se motions. We dismiss Appeal No. 07-1225 for lack of appellate jurisdiction, because Gamboa filed his notice of appeal before a final order was entered. Cf. Waterson v. Hall, 515 F.3d 852, 853, 855-57 (8th Cir. 2008) (dismissing appeals for lack of jurisdiction when court concluded there was no final appealable order). As to
1 The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota. Appeal No. 07-1338, we find no basis for reversal and accordingly affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Michael Gamboa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-gamboa-ca8-2008.