United States v. Michael Eugene Horton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Michael Eugene Horton

416 F.2d 1052

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 14, 1969

Docket13439

StatusPublished

This text of 416 F.2d 1052 (United States v. Michael Eugene Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Michael Eugene Horton, 416 F.2d 1052 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant’s conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, 18 U.S.C. § 113, rests in part upon his statement made to the police after he was duly warned of his constitutional rights. He challenges the admission of his statement made under Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963), but we think the defendant fails to bring himself within the rule of that case. United States v. Close, 349 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1965).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant’s conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, 18 U.S.C. § 113, rests in part upon his statement made to the police after he was duly warned of his constitutional rights. He challenges the admission of his statement made under Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963), but we think the defendant fails to bring himself within the rule of that case. United States v. Close, 349 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1965).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

416 F.2d 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-eugene-horton-ca4-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack