United States v. Michael Curry

84 F. App'x 727
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 9, 2004·No. 03-1801·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Curry (Curry) challenges as excessive the 9-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed following revocation of Curry’s supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that Curry’s revocation sentence is well below the maximum imprisonment term authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines policy statements, and is not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Curry, 84 F. App'x 727 (8th Cir. 2004).

84 F. App'x 727 (United States v. Michael Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Grimes
54 F.3d 489 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)