United States v. Michael Curry

84 F. App'x 727
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 2004
Docket03-1801
StatusUnpublished

This text of 84 F. App'x 727 (United States v. Michael Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Curry, 84 F. App'x 727 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Curry (Curry) challenges as excessive the 9-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed following revocation of Curry’s supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that Curry’s revocation sentence is well below the maximum imprisonment term authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines policy statements, and is not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Grimes
54 F.3d 489 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. App'x 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-curry-ca8-2004.