United States v. Michael Byers

6 F. App'x 526
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2001
Docket98-3280
StatusUnpublished

This text of 6 F. App'x 526 (United States v. Michael Byers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Byers, 6 F. App'x 526 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Byers pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Because he had refused to identify any of his drug suppliers or customers to the government, citing his religious and moral beliefs, *527 the district court 1 denied his request for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5) and U.S.S.G. § 501.2(5), and sentenced him to 120 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Byers challenges the denial on appeal.

We conclude that Byers did not satisfy the requirements for safety-valve relief, and that the district court did not clearly err in denying it. See United States v. Tournier, 171 F.3d 645, 647 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review); United States v. Santana, 150 F.3d 860, 864 (8th Cir.1998) (defendant carries burden of demonstrating that he has truthfully provided to government all information he knows about relevant crime); United States v. Romo, 81 F.3d 84, 85 (8th Cir.1996) (to receive safety-valve relief, defendant is obligated to provide information about identities and participation of others involved in chain of distribution); cf. United States v. McQuay, 7 F.3d 800, 802-03 (8th Cir.1993) (requiring defendant to incriminate self to “reap the benefit of’ acceptance-of-responsibility reduction does not punish him for exercise of Fifth Amendment right).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wesley McQuay
7 F.3d 800 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Eliseo Rodrigo Romo
81 F.3d 84 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Flavio Diaz Santana
150 F.3d 860 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. App'x 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-byers-ca8-2001.