United States v. Michael Bernard Johnson
This text of United States v. Michael Bernard Johnson (United States v. Michael Bernard Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 17-10007 Date Filed: 10/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 17-10007 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00028-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL BERNARD JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________
(October 20, 2017)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 17-10007 Date Filed: 10/20/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Brandon N. Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Bernard Johnson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr.
Johnson and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Although the brief does not satisfy the requirements of an Anders brief, see,
e.g., United States v. Edwards, 822 F.2d 1012, 1013 (11th Cir. 1987), our
independent and plenary review of the entire record reveals that Mr. Fleming’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Mr. Fleming’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mr. Johnson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Michael Bernard Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-bernard-johnson-ca11-2017.