United States v. Michael Berkley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 28, 2023
• Docket: 22-4732
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4732 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-4732

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL RAFAEL BERKLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:22-cr-00101-MHL-1)

Submitted: February 10, 2023 Decided: February 28, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Rafael Berkley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4732 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rafael Berkley appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate

judge’s order directing that Berkley be detained pending resolution of the criminal charges

against him. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United

States v. Clark, 865 F.2d 1433, 1437 (4th Cir. 1989) (citing standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Berkley, No. 3:22-cr-00101-MHL-1 (E.D. Va.

Dec. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).