United States v. Meyers

D. Connecticut

United States v. Meyers

190 F. 688, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175

CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut

DecidedOctober 9, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 190 F. 688 (United States v. Meyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Meyers, 190 F. 688, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175 (D. Conn. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

The committee correctly interpreted the law as I find it to be, disregarding all evidence touching the question of special damage to the tenants Bernd and Huber, which might grow out of taking down, carrying away, and setting up again in a new location, the fixtures in their stores, which they had the right to remove, together with loss of profits during the céssation of business resulting from such removal. What the damage would have been, if said testimony had been taken into account, is therefore immaterial, and the alternative part of the report is of no service to the court.

Let judgment be entered, based upon the original findings of the committee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

The committee correctly interpreted the law as I find it to be, disregarding all evidence touching the question of special damage to the tenants Bernd and Huber, which might grow out of taking down, carrying away, and setting up again in a new location, the fixtures in their stores, which they had the right to remove, together with loss of profits during the céssation of business resulting from such removal. What the damage would have been, if said testimony had been taken into account, is therefore immaterial, and the alternative part of the report is of no service to the court.

Let judgment be entered, based upon the original findings of the committee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 F. 688, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-meyers-ctd-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack