United States v. Meyer

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Meyer

816 F.2d 695, 259 U.S. App. D.C. 391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9164

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 30, 1987·No. No. 85-6169·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the court en banc, that appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the court en , banc, that the opinion and judgment of February 13,1987 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the court en banc, that appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the court en , banc, that the opinion and judgment of February 13,1987 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

United States v. Meyer, 816 F.2d 695, 259 U.S. App. D.C. 391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9164 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pincite

816 F.2d 695 (United States v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related