United States v. Meyer

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Meyer

816 F.2d 695, 259 U.S. App. D.C. 391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9164

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 1987

DocketNo. 85-6169

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 816 F.2d 695 (United States v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Meyer, 816 F.2d 695, 259 U.S. App. D.C. 391, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9164 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the court en banc, that appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the court en , banc, that the opinion and judgment of February 13,1987 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI