United States v. Meyer

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Meyer

403 F.2d 52

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 1968

DocketNo. 22358A

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 403 F.2d 52 (United States v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Meyer, 403 F.2d 52 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this Dyer Act conviction we hold it was not error to permit one F.B.I. agent to sit at the government table during the trial although he was a witness. The instruction given on guilty knowledge was as good as the one submitted by the defendant, and it was adequate. The trial judge was a little impatient at one point, but the jury was adequately instructed on the point.

Other objections here were not properly made or preserved in the trial court, but we find them without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this Dyer Act conviction we hold it was not error to permit one F.B.I. agent to sit at the government table during the trial although he was a witness. The instruction given on guilty knowledge was as good as the one submitted by the defendant, and it was adequate. The trial judge was a little impatient at one point, but the jury was adequately instructed on the point.

Other objections here were not properly made or preserved in the trial court, but we find them without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 F.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-meyer-ca9-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack