United States v. Meyer
403 F.2d 52
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 15, 1968·No. No. 22358A·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this Dyer Act conviction we hold it was not error to permit one F.B.I. agent to sit at the government table during the trial although he was a witness. The instruction given on guilty knowledge was as good as the one submitted by the defendant, and it was adequate. The trial judge was a little impatient at one point, but the jury was adequately instructed on the point.
Other objections here were not properly made or preserved in the trial court, but we find them without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Meyer, 403 F.2d 52 (9th Cir. 1968).
403 F.2d 52 (United States v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Joseph Mack Thomas
835 F.2d 219 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)