United States v. Mestchersky
This text of 411 F.2d 610 (United States v. Mestchersky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of conviction entered in the Southern District of New York, upon a jury verdict, for making false statements to the Immigration and Naturalization Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. S 1001.
Appellant was given a fair trial; there was abundant evidence to support the verdict. Evidence as to appellant’s dealings with Morris Moche was properly admitted, as bearing on the 'motive for the allegedly false statement that certain papers had been lost. Moreover, except for one answer, no objection was made to any of this evidence. It is apparent from the record that this was part of the defense strategy, as it furnished a basis for attacking the credibility and bias of Moche, who was the principal prosecution witness.
Nor was there any improper prejudice to the defendant in the few questions which the trial judge put to him.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 F.2d 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mestchersky-ca2-1969.