United States v. Merwin Smith

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: January 23, 2026
• Docket: 24-2445
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-2445 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Merwin Smith

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: October 20, 2025 Filed: January 23, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

During a traffic stop, officers searched Merwin Smith and found a loaded pistol strapped between his shoulder blades. He was arrested and charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). A jury found him guilty. Smith argues that the district court 1 abused its discretion under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) by admitting evidence of his prior felon-in-possession convictions. But even if the district court should not have admitted the evidence, the error was harmless. United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1003–04 (8th Cir. 2004) (reviewing for harmless error). Three different witnesses testified that Smith had a pistol strapped to his back. “[W]e will not reverse for improperly admitted [evidence] when, as here, the record contains ‘overwhelming evidence’ supporting the conviction.” United States v. Finley, 56 F.4th 1159, 1167 (8th Cir. 2023) (citation omitted).

Smith’s argument that his prosecution under § 922(g)(1) violated the Second Amendment is foreclosed by United States v. Jackson, 110 F.4th 1120, 1125 (8th Cir. 2024).

Affirmed. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-