United States v. Merriweather

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Merriweather

616 F. App'x 69

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 14, 2015

DocketNo. 15-7118

StatusPublished

This text of 616 F. App'x 69 (United States v. Merriweather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Merriweather, 616 F. App'x 69 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danny Merriweather, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of his self-styled “Motion to Dismiss Indictment, Information or Complaint Pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act Section IV(e).” On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Merriweather’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Merriweather has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danny Merriweather, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of his self-styled “Motion to Dismiss Indictment, Information or Complaint Pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act Section IV(e).” On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Merriweather’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Merriweather has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 F. App'x 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-merriweather-ca4-2015.