United States v. Merrill Gardner

695 F. App'x 262
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 14, 2017
Docket16-30183
StatusUnpublished

This text of 695 F. App'x 262 (United States v. Merrill Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Merrill Gardner, 695 F. App'x 262 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Merrill Clark Gardner appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 183-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gardner contends that the district court erred by applying a four-level aggravating role enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a). We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The district court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded, based on the undisputed facts in the pre-sentence report and the testimony of Special Agent Robert Grayson, that Gardner acted as a leader or organizer of the conspiracy 'within the meaning of section 3B1.1(a). See United States v. Rivera, 527 F.3d 891, 908-09 (9th Cir. 2008) (enhancement supported where evidence established that defendant exercised control over others and “exercised decision making authority in the procurement and distribution of narcotics”); see also United States v. Garcia, 497 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir. 2007) (enhancement “does not require control over all of the five or more participants”).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Garcia
497 F.3d 964 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Rivera
527 F.3d 891 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Francisco Gasca-Ruiz
852 F.3d 1167 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 F. App'x 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-merrill-gardner-ca9-2017.