United States v. Merman Lee Keller
This text of 361 F.2d 219 (United States v. Merman Lee Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
361 F.2d 219
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Merman Lee KELLER, Appellant.
No. 10345.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 3, 1966.
Decided May 6, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby.
Clement Manly Llewellyn, Ann Llewellyn McKenzie, and Llewellyn, McKenzie & Llewellyn, Concord, N.C., on brief for appellant.
Wm. Medford U.S. Atty. (William M. Styles, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BRYAN, Circuit Judge, and FIELD, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Upon an examination of the record and consideration of the contentions of counsel, we find no substantial error affecting the rights of the appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F.2d 219, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-merman-lee-keller-ca4-1966.