United States v. Meredith Preston Lawson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Meredith Preston Lawson

384 F.2d 709, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4808

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 20, 1967

Docket11517

StatusPublished

This text of 384 F.2d 709 (United States v. Meredith Preston Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Meredith Preston Lawson, 384 F.2d 709, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4808 (4th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Court-assigned counsel has earnestly contested the validity of an arrest and the seizure of incriminating material discovered in a search incident to the arrest. We affirm the conviction.

The incriminating material related to a Dyer Act offense of which the defendant was tried and convicted. The arrest was for the theft of a television set. The defendant, who had engaged a room in a motel, was seen leaving it with a television set. Seen departing the motel area by a back way with his automobile lights out, he sought to flee a high speed chase. When overtaken and stopped, there appeared to be no television set in his car, * but that circumstance did not destroy the probable cause to believe that he had stolen the set. *710 Certainly there was probable cause for such belief when the police officer took him into custody, for he then knew, additionally, that the set was missing from the motel room.

The testimony disclosing the defendant’s alteration of title documents on another vehicle to describe the stolen one, was obviously relevant and admissible.

Affirmed.

*

It was later found behind a bush on the motel grounds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Court-assigned counsel has earnestly contested the validity of an arrest and the seizure of incriminating material discovered in a search incident to the arrest. We affirm the conviction.

The incriminating material related to a Dyer Act offense of which the defendant was tried and convicted. The arrest was for the theft of a television set. The defendant, who had engaged a room in a motel, was seen leaving it with a television set. Seen departing the motel area by a back way with his automobile lights out, he sought to flee a high speed chase. When overtaken and stopped, there appeared to be no television set in his car, * but that circumstance did not destroy the probable cause to believe that he had stolen the set. *710 Certainly there was probable cause for such belief when the police officer took him into custody, for he then knew, additionally, that the set was missing from the motel room.

The testimony disclosing the defendant’s alteration of title documents on another vehicle to describe the stolen one, was obviously relevant and admissible.

Affirmed.

*

It was later found behind a bush on the motel grounds.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 F.2d 709, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-meredith-preston-lawson-ca4-1967.