United States v. Mercado

37 F. App'x 698
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 2002
Docket01-8082
StatusUnpublished

This text of 37 F. App'x 698 (United States v. Mercado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mercado, 37 F. App'x 698 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In February 1999, while already serving a related state sentence, Otoniel Alvarez Mercado was sentenced in federal court to eighty-four months imprisonment after he pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine and marijuana. On September 21, 2001, Mercado filed a “Nunc Pro Tunc” motion seeking jail credit on his federal sentence for the time spent in state custody on the related conviction. The district court denied the motion on the merits, and Mercado appealed.

We view Mercado’s motion as a request for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) filed in the wrong district court (Mercado is incarcerated in Jesup, Georgia) and without exhausting the Bureau of Prisons’ administrative remedies. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Mercado’s motion, but we modify the district court’s order to reflect a dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, rather than a dismissal based on the merits. We expressly decline to address the merit or lack thereof of Mercado’s motion, so that Mercado remains free to file a § 2241 petition in the proper court after exhausting his administrative remedies.

We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mercado-ca4-2002.