United States v. Mendoza-Plascencia
This text of 88 F. App'x 226 (United States v. Mendoza-Plascencia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martin Mendoza-Plascencia appeals the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). We dismiss this appeal.
Mendoza-Plascencia challenges the district court’s decision denying his requests for a downward departure based on his claims that his criminal history was overrepresented, and that his alleged minimal role in his prior drug trafficking conviction took his case outside the “heartland.”
Because the district court specifically declined to exercise its discretion to depart on both issues, we lack jurisdiction to address Mendoza-Plascencia’s contentions. See United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 627-28, 122 S.Ct. 2450, 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2002); United States v. Garcia-Garcia, 927 F.2d 489, 490 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mendoza-plascencia-ca9-2004.