United States v. Mendoza
This text of 334 F. App'x 97 (United States v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Chalena Mendoza appeals from the 21-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Mendoza contends that the district court erred by enhancing her sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(6) because the facts did not support the enhancement. Mendoza also contends that the district court applied the wrong legal standard. These contentions lack merit. See U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(6), cmt. n. 5; see also United States v. Miguel, 368 F.3d 1150, 1155-56 (9th Cir.2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F. App'x 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mendoza-ca9-2009.