United States v. Mendoza
This text of United States v. Mendoza (United States v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-50748 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ABELARDO MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-52-1 --------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Abelardo Mendoza on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mendoza
has responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the
brief, the record, and Mendoza’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mendoza-ca5-2007.