United States v. Mendoza
This text of United States v. Mendoza (United States v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 98-10876 -1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-10876 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TONY PEÑA MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-81-2 -------------------- February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Tony Peña Mendoza moves to
withdraw as appellate counsel and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Mendoza
was informed by the Clerk’s Office that he was entitled to file a
response to counsel’s Anders brief, he has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-10876 -2-
5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mendoza-ca5-2000.