United States v. Mendoza

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
Docket98-10876
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Mendoza (United States v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mendoza, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

No. 98-10876 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10876 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY PEÑA MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-81-2 -------------------- February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Tony Peña Mendoza moves to

withdraw as appellate counsel and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Mendoza

was informed by the Clerk’s Office that he was entitled to file a

response to counsel’s Anders brief, he has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-10876 -2-

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mendoza-ca5-2000.