United States v. Mendieta

391 F. App'x 363
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2010·No. No. 09-40815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Modesto Mendieta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Mendieta has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Mendie-ta’s untimely motion for appointment of substitute counsel or alternatively for leave to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mendieta, 391 F. App'x 363 (5th Cir. 2010).

391 F. App'x 363 (United States v. Mendieta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wagner
158 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)