United States v. Mendez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mendez

577 F. App'x 166

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2014·No. No. 14-6668·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for free copies of his Annual Supervision Reports and denying his motion for a transfer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-[167]*16700B50-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for free copies of his Annual Supervision Reports and denying his motion for a transfer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-[167]*16700B50-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mendez, 577 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

577 F. App'x 166 (United States v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.