United States v. Mendez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mendez

486 F. App'x 362

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2012·No. No. 12-7096·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s order finding that he continues to meet the criteria for commitment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s order finding that he continues to meet the criteria for commitment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mendez, 486 F. App'x 362 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

486 F. App'x 362 (United States v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related