United States v. Mendez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mendez

68 F. App'x 489

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2003·No. No. 02-7864·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and revoking his conditional release and remanding him to the custody of the Attorney General. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also [490] deny the motion for an appeal bond and a change of venue. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and revoking his conditional release and remanding him to the custody of the Attorney General. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also [490] deny the motion for an appeal bond and a change of venue. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mendez, 68 F. App'x 489 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

68 F. App'x 489 (United States v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related