United States v. Melvin Lee Sharp
This text of 48 F.3d 1218 (United States v. Melvin Lee Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Melvin Lee SHARP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-6722.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.
Melvin Lee Sharp, Appellant pro se.
Paul Arthur Billups, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sharp, Nos. CR-90-255; CA-93-634-3 (S.D.W. Va. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10966, 1995 WL 88932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-melvin-lee-sharp-ca4-1995.