United States v. Melvin Douglas Brown

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Melvin Douglas Brown

443 F.2d 1174, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9189

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1971

Docket14369_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 443 F.2d 1174 (United States v. Melvin Douglas Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Melvin Douglas Brown, 443 F.2d 1174, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9189 (4th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After full consideration of the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no error in the proceedings resulting in the appellant’s conviction for bank robbery (18 U.S.C.A. § 2113).

Since concurrent sentences were imposed on the three counts of the indictment, we remand the case for imposition of a single sentence. United States v. Retolaza, 4 Cir., 398 F.2d 235; United States v. Spears, 4 Cir., 442 F.2d 424.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After full consideration of the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no error in the proceedings resulting in the appellant’s conviction for bank robbery (18 U.S.C.A. § 2113).

Since concurrent sentences were imposed on the three counts of the indictment, we remand the case for imposition of a single sentence. United States v. Retolaza, 4 Cir., 398 F.2d 235; United States v. Spears, 4 Cir., 442 F.2d 424.

Affirmed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F.2d 1174, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-melvin-douglas-brown-ca4-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack