United States v. Melvin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Melvin. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 F. App'x 43
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 16, 2000·No. 00-6287·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN JERMAINE MELVIN, a/k/a Baby-Boy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-139-5-2-F, CA-98-950-5-F)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Jermaine Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Stuart Wilson, OF- FICE OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jermaine Melvin appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion. Our review of the

record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Melvin, Nos. CR-94-139-5-2-F; CA-98-950-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Melvin, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Melvin (United States v. Melvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related