United States v. Melvin B. Brown
This text of 455 F.3d 267 (United States v. Melvin B. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand the record, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted, and that the record in this appeal be remanded to the district court “for the limited purpose of allowing it to determine whether it would have imposed a different sentence, materially more favorable to the defendant, had it been fully aware of the post-Booker sentencing regime.” United States v. Coles, 403 F.3d 764 (D.C.Cir. 2005) (citing United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that this case be held in abeyance pending further order of the court.
The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. The district court is requested to notify this court promptly upon its determination of the question on remand. The parties are directed to file motions to govern further proceedings within 30 days of the district court’s notification.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
455 F.3d 267, 372 U.S. App. D.C. 182, 2005 WL 4344149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-melvin-b-brown-cadc-2005.