United States v. Medrano
This text of United States v. Medrano (United States v. Medrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50207 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL JESUS MEDRANO, also known as Chuy,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-304-7-DB --------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Manuel Jesus Medrano has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Medrano has not filed a
response to the motion. Our review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Medrano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-medrano-ca5-2005.