United States v. Medrano
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41412 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOE ERLINDO MEDRANO, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-89-CR-89-1 -------------------- June 15, 2001
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joe
Erlindo Medrano has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as
counsel and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Medrano received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief reveals no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Medrano (United States v. Medrano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.