United States v. Medrano

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Medrano

322 F. App'x 949

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 14, 2009·No. No. 08-10776·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia J. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Rufino Medrano in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Medrano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia J. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Rufino Medrano in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Medrano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Medrano, 322 F. App'x 949 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

322 F. App'x 949 (United States v. Medrano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related