United States v. Medjuck
This text of 22 F. App'x 872 (United States v. Medjuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We agree with the district court that Medjuck’s claim of being “tricked” constitutes a challenge to the district court’s ruling that the government could use the tape to impeach Medjuck if he testified. Because Medjuck did not testify, he did not preserve that issue for appeal. See [873]*873United States v. Johnson, 903 F.2d 1219, 1222-23 (9th Cir.1990).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-medjuck-ca9-2001.