United States v. Medina-Valencia

445 F. App'x 251
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 26, 2011·No. No. 10-15752·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Hernandez, appointed counsel for Jose Medina-Valencia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Medina-Valencia, in response, has filed a motion seeking permission to proceed informa pauperis, and to file a pro se brief. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Medina-Valencia’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Medina-Valencia’s motion seeking permission to proceed informa pauperis, and to file a pro se brief, is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Medina-Valencia, 445 F. App'x 251 (11th Cir. 2011).

445 F. App'x 251 (United States v. Medina-Valencia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)