United States v. Medina Perez
This text of 109 F. App'x 931 (United States v. Medina Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Victor Medina Perez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Medina-Perez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Medina-Perez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw the Anders brief and file a new opening brief is DENIED. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
The mandate is stayed pending the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in United States v. Booker, No. 04-104, 2004 WL 2331491 (U.S.2004), and United States v. Fanfan, No. 04-105.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [932]*932courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. App'x 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-medina-perez-ca9-2004.