United States v. Medina

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2023·No. 22-50382·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-50382 Document: 00516610471 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 22-50382 January 13, 2023 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Frank Medina, Jr.,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:21-CR-49-16 ______________________________

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Counsel appointed to represent Frank Medina, Jr., on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Medina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-50382 Document: 00516610471 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2023

22-50382

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Medina, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Medina (United States v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)