United States v. Medina
This text of United States v. Medina (United States v. Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20948 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO MEDINA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-61-2 - - - - - - - - - -
June 17, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Antonio Medina appeals from his conviction by guilty plea of
illegal importation of Freon. Medina contends that the
Government breached his plea agreement by failing to recommend
sentencing at the low end of the guideline range.
Medina did not raise his contention in the district court;
his contention is reviewed for plain error. United States v.
Cerverizzo, 74 F.3d 629, 631 (5th Cir. 1996). Whether Medina
provided the cooperation necessary to obtain the Government’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. recommendation is a factual issue that could have been resolved
by the district court upon proper objection; Medina therefore
cannot demonstrate plain error. United States v. Alvarado-
Saldivar, 62 F.3d 697, 700 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Medina, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-medina-ca5-1999.