United States v. Medeiros

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 12, 1998·No. 97-1611·Unpublished

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 97-1611

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MEDEIROS,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,

Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.

Thomas A. Grasso on brief for appellant.

Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, Margaret E. Curran

and Charles A. Tamuleviz, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief

for appellee.

February 10, 1998

Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the record, briefs,

and the government's motion for summary disposition, it

plainly appears that the district court's discretionary

decision to deny a downward departure is not subject to

appellate review. See United States v. Saldana, 109 F.3d

100, 103 (1st Cir. 1997).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Medeiros, (1st Cir. 1998).

United States v. Medeiros (United States v. Medeiros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Saldana
109 F.3d 100 (First Circuit, 1997)