United States v. Mecham
This text of United States v. Mecham (United States v. Mecham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-40761 Document: 00515823889 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED April 15, 2021 No. 20-40761 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Clifford Laverne Mecham, Jr.,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:18-CR-1339-1
Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Clifford Laverne Mecham, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed at resentencing for his conviction for possession of child pornography. This court previously vacated Mecham’s sentence based on the district court’s misapplication of the U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(4)(A) enhancement. Mecham
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-40761 Document: 00515823889 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2021
No. 20-40761
has moved for summary disposition, asserting that 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 2256(8)(C) are unconstitutional as applied to him. “On a second appeal following remand, the only issue for consideration is whether the [district court] reached its final decree in due pursuance of [this court’s] previous opinion and mandate.” Burroughs v. FFP Operating Partners, 70 F.3d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1995). Because Mecham’s argument challenging the constitutionality of §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 2256(8)(C) as applied to him is beyond this court’s remand order, we decline to consider it. See Burroughs, 70 F.3d at 33. Accordingly, Mecham’s motion for summary disposition is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mecham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mecham-ca5-2021.