United States v. McWaine
This text of United States v. McWaine (United States v. McWaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 21-60474 Document: 00516360557 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED June 16, 2022 No. 21-60474 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Derwin Renwick McWaine,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:98-CR-22-1
Before Barksdale, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Proceeding pro se, Derwin Renwick McWaine, federal prisoner # 10797-042, appeals the district court’s denial of reconsideration of its denial of his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194.
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-60474 Document: 00516360557 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2022
No. 21-60474
McWaine was convicted of violating federal drug-trafficking, firearms, and money-laundering statutes. Our court affirmed McWaine’s convictions but vacated his sentence and remanded the case to district court for resentencing in the light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), specifically his sentence of life imprisonment for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A): our court held that, as a result, the sentence could not be based on 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), but instead on 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (20-year statutory maximum). United States v. McWaine, 243 F.3d 871, 875–76 (5th Cir. 2001). On remand, he was resentenced to, inter alia, a total of 50 years’ imprisonment, which included a 20-year sentence for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine. Our court affirmed his sentence, except for a modification to his supervised-release term. United States v. McWaine, 290 F.3d 269, 277 (5th Cir. 2002). McWaine asserts: on remand, the district court should have retried him on the drug conspiracy charge or sentenced him to a total of 20 years in prison; and, because it did not, his sentence was calculated based upon the above-referenced 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)—a “covered offense” under the First Step Act. The denial of a motion for reconsideration is generally reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Rabhan, 540 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 2008). As discussed, McWaine was sentenced on remand for his drug- conspiracy offense to the 20-year maximum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). And, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-220, sec. 2(a), 124 Stat. 2372, made retroactive by the First Step Act, “did not modify the statutory penalties for” offenses under § 841(b)(1)(C). Terry v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1858, 1861–63 (2021). Consequently, McWaine’s drug-conspiracy offense is not a “covered offense” under the First Step Act, and he was
2 Case: 21-60474 Document: 00516360557 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/16/2022
ineligible for a sentencing reduction. See id. at 1862–64 (explaining § 841(b)(1)(C) not “covered offense” and, therefore, does not warrant sentence reduction under First Step Act). AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McWaine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcwaine-ca5-2022.