United States v. McQuistion
This text of United States v. McQuistion (United States v. McQuistion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 28, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 03-51050 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEVIN MARK MCQUISTION,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-03-CR-52-1 --------------------
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kevin Mark McQuistion appeals from his conditional guilty-
plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine.
McQuistion argues that the district court erred in denying his
motion to suppress evidence found in a refrigerator and microwave
located on the premises of the Basin Welding Supply Company. The
record shows that Charles Joyce, an owner of the Basin Welding
Supply Company, had common authority to consent to the police
search. See United States v. Shelton, 337 F.3d 529, 531-32 (5th
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-51050 -2-
Cir. 2003), petition for cert. filed, 72 U.S.L.W. 3393 (U.S. Nov.
24, 2003) (No. 03-781). As a result, the district court
correctly denied McQuistion’s motion to suppress evidence.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McQuistion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcquistion-ca5-2004.