United States v. McPherson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

United States v. McPherson

26 F. Cas. 1137, 1 Cranch 517

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 26 F. Cas. 1137 (United States v. McPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. McPherson, 26 F. Cas. 1137, 1 Cranch 517 (circtddc 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

CRANCH, Chief Judge, and DUCKETT, Circuit Judge,

were of opinion, but did not deliver it, that the prisoner was not entitled to a peremptory challenge. In the case of U. S. v. Carrigo [Case No. 14,735], at Alexandria, in January, 1802, it was refused by the court Upon examining W. Craneh’s notes in Washington, he could find no case in which it had been allowed in Washington. It has been lately allowed in Alexandria, by the assent of the attorney for the United States. • It was never allowed in Mr Mason’s time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRANCH, Chief Judge, and DUCKETT, Circuit Judge,

were of opinion, but did not deliver it, that the prisoner was not entitled to a peremptory challenge. In the case of U. S. v. Carrigo [Case No. 14,735], at Alexandria, in January, 1802, it was refused by the court Upon examining W. Craneh’s notes in Washington, he could find no case in which it had been allowed in Washington. It has been lately allowed in Alexandria, by the assent of the attorney for the United States. • It was never allowed in Mr Mason’s time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F. Cas. 1137, 1 Cranch 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcpherson-circtddc-1808.