United States v. McPherson

73 M.J. 345, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 519
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McPherson. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 M.J. 393
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided May 8, 2014·No. No. 14-0348/AF & 14-5002/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA S32068. Review granted on the following issue:

THERE IS A SPLIT IN THE SERVICE COURTS. IN THIS CASE AND AT LEAST 10 UNPUBLISHED CASES, THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (AFCCA) HAS HELD THAT AN APPELLANT MUST EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED UNDER ARTICLE 12, UCMJ. NO OTHER SERVICE COURT HAS HELD THE SAME. GIVEN THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF ARTICLE 12, UCMJ, DID THE AFCCA ERR WHEN IT REQUIRED APPELLANT TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE RECEIVING RELIEF?

No briefs will be filed on this issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McPherson, 73 M.J. 345, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 519 (Ark. 2014).

73 M.J. 345 (United States v. McPherson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.