United States v. McMahon
This text of 26 F. Cas. 1131 (United States v. McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
refused. See the Maryland Act of 1789, c. 22, § 5.
Upon the trial, Mr. Brent, for the prisoner, offered to prove that another person confessed that he killed the deceased; and that person had fled.
The Court (Thruston, J., absent,) rejected the evidence. Upon calling.the jurors to the book to be sworn, Mr. James Friend, one of the panel, said that he was conscientiously opposed to punishment by death, and could not conscientiously .find aman guilty of a capital offence.
Whereupon, Mr. Key, the Attorney for the United States, challenged him for favor. The two first sworn jurors were sworn as triors, “ well and truly to try whether James Friend stands indifferent between the United States and the prisoner at the bar; ” and they found that he did not; having heard the declaration which he had just made to the Court; and thereupon he ivas set aside.
At 10 o’clock, P. M., the jury found the prisoner “ guilty of [574]*574manslaughter in a most aggravated ease; and not guilty of murder.”
The sentence of the Court was eight years’ labor in the penitentiary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 1131, 4 D.C. 573, 4 Cranch 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcmahon-circtddc-1835.