United States v. McMahan

Sixth Circuit

United States v. McMahan

84 F.2d 1017, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4808

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1936

DocketNo. 6987

StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 1017 (United States v. McMahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. McMahan, 84 F.2d 1017, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4808 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was no substantial evidence that appellee’s intestate, Adam Warren McMahan, became totally and permanently disabled within the life of the policy sued upon, and that the motion for a directed verdict made by appellant at the close of all the evidence should have been granted, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment be, and the same is, reversed, and the cause remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was no substantial evidence that appellee’s intestate, Adam Warren McMahan, became totally and permanently disabled within the life of the policy sued upon, and that the motion for a directed verdict made by appellant at the close of all the evidence should have been granted, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment be, and the same is, reversed, and the cause remanded for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F.2d 1017, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mcmahan-ca6-1936.