United States v. McLymont
This text of United States v. McLymont (United States v. McLymont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 22, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40375 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
MARTINDALE F MCLYMONT
Defendant - Appellant
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:02-CR-141-2 --------------------
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Martindale F . McLymont
has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McLymont has filed
a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and McLymont’s response, discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. McLymont, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mclymont-ca5-2007.